You are browsing the archive for satellite.

Seasonality in the Ocean

April 27, 2011 in Education Materials

Developed by: Katie Gardner, and Kate Florio

Download the pdf of this lesson

Topic:

Explore the concept of seasonality within the ocean. Compare and contrast differences between seasons on land and seasons in the ocean. Discuss the reasons for the similarities and differences. Students will be introduced to ocean data in the form of sea surface color (chlorophyll) and sea surface temperature (SST).

Audience:

Grades 8 – 12

Length:

30 to 45 minutes

NJ State Standards:

  • 5.1.A – Understand Scientific Explanations
  • 5.4.A – Objects in the Universe
  • 5.4.E – Energy in Earth Systems
  • 5.4.F – Weather and Climate
  • 5.4.G – Biogeochemical Cycles

Objectives:

  • Observe similarities and differences between seasons on land and seasons in the ocean.
  • Explain scientifically why differences are observed, and why there are similarities.
  • Use understanding of seasons to interpret ocean observing system data products.

Introduction:

This activity is meant to open discussion on the idea of seasonality within the ocean. How would students know what season it is if they didn’t have a calendar? What things do they think of in the spring, summer, fall, winter? Does the ocean have seasons? Do all places in the world have the same seasons?

Background:

The data products used for this activity are seven year monthly composites of Sea Surface Temperature (SST) and Ocean Color measured and compiled from the New York Bight region of the Atlantic Basin. Four months of the year (January, April, July, and October) were chosen as representative of a season.

SST data is measured using satellites, which record infrared radiation from the ocean surface in several different wavelengths. This can be a good real world application to discuss or review the electromagnetic spectrum. The temperature values measured are converted to a color in order to create a false color map. False color maps are created as a visual tool to observe patterns and differences within the data collected. These maps are not in true-life color nor are they photographs/pictures.

Ocean color is a satellite measure of how green the water appears. This measure is a proxy* for the amount of chlorophyll in the ocean. Chlorophyll is a chemical in plants that facilitates photosynthesis, allowing plants to convert sunlight and CO2 into organic compounds for energy and structure. Most varieties of this chemical are green, and this is why many plants are green. Chlorophyll is present in ocean plants too, the mostly microscopic forms of phytoplankton found in the surface ocean. More green means more chlorophyll, and hence more plants. This data is also presented as a false color map.

*A proxy is measuring one thing, and directly relating it to another variable that we are interested in. Proxies are often used when direct measurement of a variable is not easily performed, or available.

Materials:

  • Color printouts of the Chlorophyll and Temperature Data Sheets* (SeasonalDataSheets.pdf)
  • One Plastic sheet protector for each print out sheet (optional)

* This data was provided by Rutgers University Coastal Ocean Observation Laboratory (RU COOL), specifically for this lesson. It is a 7 year composite from 2000-2006 of January, April, July, and October. Each data page represents one month. The use of composite data was chosen to focus students on patterns of temperature and chlorophyll.

Procedure:

I. Preparation

  1. Print out one set of data sheets for each pair or group of students
  2. Slide each sheet into a plastic sheet protector if desired

II. Activity

  1. Hand out color copies of the chlorophyll/temperature data.
    There are 4 pages of data; each page is one month of the year.
  2. Have students work in pairs or small groups of to decide which page is in each season, and order them winter, spring, summer, fall.
  3. Some questions that would help guide students could include:
    1. When is the most chlorophyll present? Why?
    2. Does this data show seasons in the ocean the same way we think of seasons on land?
    3. What other data could you look up that would show changes in seasons?
  4. When viewing these data sheets, do not rely on the chlorophyll data directly along the coast. This coastal growth is seen year round. It grows on the nutrients entering the ocean in estuaries, as rivers bring their load in from the continent; there is also a lot of sediment and other particles that can color the water in these areas (remember we are using color as a proxy for chlorophyll). Connections can be made between this and health of watersheds. Ocean blooms will be seen further from the coast.
  5. Data Sheet Key:
    1. Fall – highest water temperatures, bloom in the ocean is fading to yellow and small in size.
    2. Winter – low water temperatures, little to no phytoplankton in St. Georges Bank region.
    3. Summer – warm temperatures, slightly smaller orange bloom in ocean.
    4. Spring – cold water temperatures, large bright red bloom in the ocean.

Evaluation:

Have students share how they ordered the data sheets, and then explain whether they are correct or not. Students often need help understanding the discrepancies between what they think about seasons, and what is observed in the ocean. The temperature data can be misleading if you use your experience with air temperatures. Summer has the hottest months for air; however water has a much higher heat capacity than air. This means that it takes longer to heat up in the spring, and longer to cool down in the fall. The highest surface ocean temperatures are generally recorded in early September and slowly cool through the fall.

The growth of phytoplankton is related to two major factors: the availability of nutrients, and amount of sunlight. Focus on the bloom that occurs in the ocean off of Massachusetts’ Cape Cod, not along the coastline. This region is known as St. Georges Bank, a productive fishery. During the short days of winter, there is little primary productivity seen in the section of ocean shown on the data sheets. Storms are common in the region throughout the winter months, and this serves to mix the water column, bringing up nutrients from deeper water. As the days lengthen, phytoplankton use the nutrients in the water to reproduce quickly, leading to the spring bloom. As spring progresses, warming temperatures will start to stratify the surface ocean , forming layers which block continued upwelling of nutrients. The phytoplankton use up their nutrients and the bloom reduces in size. There is some recycling of nutrients within the surface through the summer, and also heavy grazing by zooplankton. As the days shorten in the fall, productivity drops off. The cooler surface water is less stratified, and storms aid in mixing; starting the seasonal cycle over.


The above composite data is a cross section of temperatures produced by Slocum gliders off the coast of New Jersey. It is shown to illustrate what is meant by temperature stratification in summer vs. winter. A similar temperature pattern is seen in the St. Georges Banks region. Winter temperatures are similar from surface to bottom due to mixing. Summer temperatures are stratified. In this image, a thermocline has developed at 15m depth. A thermocline is a horizontal boundary across which a sharp change in temperature is measured. A connection to water density and the relationship to temperature can be made here.

Extension:

Following the activity and explanation, can students explain why one location on the coast experiences different climate than a location at the same latitude on the interior of a continent? (New York City vs. Chicago) Can students relate the heat capacity of water in the ocean to having a local effect on nearby land masses? What climate differences would students expect to observe based on their reasoning? Have students find climate data to support their reasoning.

Resources:

  • Earth Exploration Toolbook explains in more detail some of the dynamics associated with ocean blooms.
  • The CoolRoom is an ocean data source for public users.
  • RUCOOL is a source for a wider array of both real time and older ocean data.

Small Plants, Big Ocean

July 17, 2009 in Ocean Observatory Stories

A microscopic image of a marine diatoms much like the one Jim used to study.  The scale change between the this image and the satellite image below is 10 to the eleventh power.

A microscopic image of a marine diatoms much like the one Jim used to study. The scale change between the this image and the satellite image below is 10 to the eleventh power.


As a graduate student, I studied microscopic plants growing in small flasks to understand the conditions that favored their growth. My goal was to use these results to predict plant growth in the ocean, or at least in the local bay. I believed that this was important research, because microscopic plants form the base of ocean food webs and ultimately determine how much life can live in the sea. I was getting great results, and my adviser and I were quite pleased with my progress. One day, my wife asked a disturbing question: “Why do you believe that what happens in your little flasks has anything to do with what actually happens in the ocean?” I didn’t have a good answer but wanted one.

For my first job, I worked with a team of ocean scientists that conducted research in coastal waters off Georgia. Now, I was actually making measurements from which I believed I could understand microscopic plant growth in coastal waters of the real ocean. But, I was still troubled by what a small area of the vast ocean one could sample by lowering water bottles from a ship. Did the stations where I focused my measurements really represent the ocean or even of the complex coastal waters of our region? I tried to convince myself that the answer was “yes”, but was frustrated because I really didn’t know.

Shortly thereafter, I met Chuck from NASA. Chuck was working on a new approach to estimate the distribution and abundance of microscopic plants in the ocean by measuring the color of ocean waters. These measurements were made by a complex instrument flown at high altitude in a NASA research airplane. Chuck wanted to cooperate with a research team that would make measurements from a ship that was in the field of view of his aircraft measurements. Chuck needed the ship data to demonstrate that his aircraft measurements were accurate. Our group wanted the aircraft measurements to determine how well the limited coverage of our ship measurements represented the conditions of a much larger region. And so we formed a partnership.

Our first experiment was a great success. The aircraft flew on a beautiful, clear day. Our ship was in the right place and in the middle of a very interesting feature that the aircraft measurements showed extended for many miles along the edge of the Gulf Stream. But the results were also frustrating. The aircraft measurements also showed that the conditions both seaward and shoreward of our interesting feature were very different. So, now what? From the point of view of understanding the distribution of microscopic plants, how could we get an even broader perspective than was possible from an airplane?

This satellite image shows the annual average phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of phytoplankton biomass) in the global ocean.  It was made by averaging all of the data collected by the SeaWiF\'s satellite sensor during a single year.

This satellite image shows the annual average phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of phytoplankton biomass) in the global ocean. It was made by averaging all of the data collected by the SeaWiF\'s satellite sensor during a single year.


To make a long story short, NASA launched a satellite in 1978 that carried an instrument similar to the one in Chuck’s airplane. It took many years to understand the data from this instrument and from other similar instruments launched subsequently; and for the computer technology to catch up, so that global data could be processed and efficiently distributed to scientists. In 1986, I was now working at NASA Headquarters as a program manager involved with supporting researchers developing this new field of satellite oceanography. One day, Chuck and his colleagues visited my office and brought a satellite image that many believe was a key milestone in biological oceanography. By merging the data from many satellite measurements collected during an entire month, Chuck and his colleagues made a color picture that showed the distribution of microscope plants in the entire North Atlantic ocean during the peak of the spring growth season. The results were stunning. One could clearly see where the productivity of the sea was greatest and where it was very low. Furthermore, subsequent images revealed the seasonal changes that occurred throughout the global ocean, as well as the impact of major ocean disturbances such as El Nino. Biological oceanographers finally had a tool to globally observe at least one important component of ocean ecosystems. And by comparing the satellite results with models and with data collected in the ocean, biological oceanographers could finally make a convincing argument that what we learned studying microscope plants in small flasks did in fact have something to do with what actually happens in the global ocean.

Alex Kahl: Life as a Graduate Student

November 19, 2008 in Movies and Presentations

Alex Kahl is a graduate student in Oceanography at Rutgers University. But this California native wasn’t always going to be a science major. In fact he originally entered college as an Art history major, but his love of surfing and the ocean soon changed his mind. This is his story.

To learn more about Alex, you can visit his web site, or check out his Antarctic Summer blog.

[Download: Quicktime | PowerPoint Slides]